Contents
Contributors
Search

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults arises as a consequence of decreased secretion of somatotrophin (GH) from the anterior pituitary. Until seventeen years ago it was widely held that GHD had little pathophysiological consequence despite the fact that earlier anecdotal reports had suggested the presence of GH-remediable symptoms of fatigue and decreased general well-being which responded to GH replacement. In retrospect, these observations of forty years ago were delineating with considerable precision the cardinal features of the syndrome but the limitation of supplies of cadaveric GH and the focus on paediatric usage meant that further information on the adult deficiency state did not occur until 1989 when the initial trials of GH replacement therapy in adult hypopituitary patients were published. Numerous subsequent studies have provided compelling evidence for the existence of a syndrome of adult GH deficiency (1, 2, 3). This is characterised by the variable presence of decreased exercise tolerance, decreased mood and general well-being, reduced bone remodelling activity, change in body fat distribution with increased central adiposity, hyperlipidaemia and increased predisposition to atherogenesis. However, it is important to recognise that adult-onset GH deficiency is due to structural pituitary disease or cranial irradiation for other pathologies and, therefore, usually occurs in the context of additional features of hypopituitarism (4). For this reason the clinical features attributable to GH deficiency may be compounded by, or directly related to, other pituitary deficiencies. Nonetheless, the fact that GH replacement therapy may favourably alter these clinical features provides considerable surrogate evidence for GH deficiency as a causal factor.

Childhood-onset GH deficiency may occur as a consequence of structural pituitary disease (e.g. craniopharyngioma) or irradiation but, in contrast to the situation of adult-onset GH deficiency, is usually a consequence of a partial deficiency of growth hormone releasing hormone. Interestingly, this latter phenomenon may not persist into adult life, possibly because of maturation of the hypothalamo-somatotroph axis, and it is therefore essential that dynamic tests of GH reserve be undertaken when linear growth is complete rather than assuming continuing GH deficiency. The true prevalence of adult-onset GH deficiency is difficult to estimate with certainty but a reasonable estimate may be obtained from prevalence data for pituitary macroadenoma which approximates to 1:10000 population. Addition of cases of childhood-onset GHD persisting into adult life gives an overall prevalence of between 2 and 3 per 10000 population.

Over the past decade there has been increasing recognition that hypopituitarism is associated with premature mortality. Studies in Sweden and the UK have demonstrated a two to three fold increase in standardised mortality ratio and this is most striking in women (5, 6, 7). Specific pituitary pathologies, especially craniopharyngioma, may convey an increased mortality rate which is likely to be independent of specific hormonal deficiencies (7). However, bearing in mind the numerical preponderance of pituitary macroadenomas as the cause of hypopituitarism, the overall findings from these studies favour an increase in morbidity and mortality from macrovascular disease and, in one of the Swedish studies, cerebrovascular disease (6). The increase in cardiovascular mortality in the initial Swedish study was paralleled by a reduction in deaths from malignant disease in males but this has not been a definite feature of subsequent observations. Much debate surrounds the mechanism for increased prevalence of vascular disease. The fact that these patients were replaced with glucocorticoids, thyroxine and in some cases gonadal steroids prompted the conclusion that untreated GH deficiency was the major causal factor. However, this interpretation makes the assumption that replacement of adrenal and thyroid deficiency was optimal and must also take account of the fact that oestrogen deficiency may not be replaced. Nonetheless, the fact that untreated GH deficiency, in the context of varying degrees of hypopituitarism, is associated with an adverse cardiovascular risk profile provides circumstantial evidence for a causative role for GH deficiency in mediating increased rates of vascular disease (8, 9, 10, 11, 12). This conclusion is further supported by a wealth of longitudinal observation documenting an improvement in central adiposity and lipoprotein profiles during GH replacement in these patients (1, 2, 3, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16). Definition of the precise relationship between GH deficiency and mortality must await long term observations of mortality rate in patients on GH replacement set against background mortality rates in the general population adjusted for national variations.

CAUSES OF GH DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS

Pituitary adenoma is numerically the most important cause of adult-onset GHD followed by craniopharyngioma which combined account for 65% of cases. The spectrum of causes of GHD in adults are indicated in Table 1 using data derived from KIMS, a multinational, pharmacoepidemiological surveillance database for adult hypopituitary patients receiving GH replacement (13). KIMS currently includes approximately 10,000 patients and is largely composed of adult-onset hypopituitary patients but also includes a proportion of patients with childhood-onset disease who have a higher percentage prevalence of craniopharyngioma and post-irradiation GHD; data for the first 2753 patients enrolled are shown. Assuming a correct initial diagnosis, the reversibility of isolated, idiopathic GHD of childhood is now well established with normal GH responses on dynamic testing being described in between 30 and 70% of subjects at completion of linear growth in various series. For this reason a diagnosis of childhood-onset isolated GHD should always be challenged by rigorous reinvestigation at completion of linear growth. Childhood-onset GHD due to genetic defects in GH synthesis is never reversible and that due to structural disease very rarely so. Isolated idiopathic GHD does not arise de novo in adults and this point is particularly important in the assessment of non-specific symptoms in overweight patients without additional evidence of pituitary disease; body mass index of >32 kg/m2 is associated with reduced GH reserve on dynamic testing in approximately 30% of patients but this is reversible with weight loss. However, combined deficiency of GH and other anterior pituitary hormones, in the absence of structural disease, may be a feature of an evolving endocrinopathy due to deficiencies of the transcription factors PIT-1 or Prop-1.

The irradiation category in Table 1 refers to those instances arising as a result of primary cranial irradiation. The contribution of irradiation to the onset of GHD in patients with pituitary adenoma or craniopharyngioma have been included under the relevant pituitary adenoma category. The designation 'Other' includes various rare causes of hypopituitarism including lymphocytic hypophysitis, intracranial germ cell tumours, Langerhans` Cell Histiocytosis and granulomatous diseases. These prevalence rates derived from the KIMS database concur very closely with experience within individual large clinics.

THE DIAGNOSIS OF GH DEFICIENCY

GH is secreted in a pulsatile fashion with serum measurements varying between peaks and troughs, the latter falling below the assay detection limit of conventional radioimmunoassays. For this reason, a diagnosis of GHD can not be made by measurement of baseline serum GH concentration although a single serum GH measurement taken fortuitously at the time of a secretory peak may serve to exclude GHD. Therefore the diagnosis of GHD is dependent on the demonstration of a subnormal rise in serum GH in response to one or more dynamic stimulation tests. Options include the insulin tolerance test (ITT), glucagon test, arginine stimulation and combinations of arginine and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) or GH secretagogues. Of these possibilities, the best validated is the insulin tolerance test which has been demonstrated to distinguish reliably between GH responses in patients with structural pituitary disease and those of age matched controls across the adult age range (17). A variety of serum GH cut off points have been used to define GH deficiency. However, an international consensus (convened by the Growth Hormone Research Society) has defined severe GHD in adults as a peak response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia of <9mU/L (<3 ng/mL) (18).

It is essential that the insulin tolerance test is carried out in dedicated units under strict supervision by experienced staff and it is contraindicated in patients with epilepsy and/or ischaemic heart disease. For those patients in whom the insulin tolerance test is contraindicated, glucagon or arginine may be used and a similar serum GH cut off is applied for the diagnosis of severe GHD (19). A particular advantage of insulin and glucagon testing is the simultaneous assessment of the adequacy of ACTH reserve. Combinations of GHRH and either arginine (or GH secretagogues) are the most potent stimuli of GH secretion so that normative data for these tests are required in order to define GHD.

As a result of an age related increase in somatostatinergic tone, spontaneous GH secretion declines by approximately 14% per decade of adult life but this does not alter substantially the response to dynamic tests of GH reserve and the same cut-off GH concentrations can be used across the age range (20). Severe obesity may decrease the GH response to insulin hypoglycaemia to levels suggestive of GHD but this is a completely reversible phenomenon if weight loss is achieved. Failure to recognise the impact of obesity on stimulated GH secretion may result in a false positive diagnosis of GHD and it is now standard practice that the diagnosis should be made in conjunction with evidence of structural pituitary disease and/or the documentation of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies. The latter provide robust support for a diagnosis of GHD because of the increasing probability of GHD in the presence of one (c.80%) or more (c.90%) additional pituitary trophic hormone deficiencies (21). The licence for GH replacement in adults stipulates that a diagnosis of GHD should be confirmed by two dynamic tests but this is not critical in a patient who has an unequivocally abnormal GH response to a single test combined with a pituitary lesion or previous history of radiotherapy and/or additional endocrine deficit.

GH secretory reserve may also be assessed by measurement of serum concentrations of the GH-dependent peptides IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and the acid labile subunit of the ternary complex (ALS). Of these, IGF-I is the most sensitive marker of GH action and provides a reliable test of GH reserve in childhood-onset disease. Its diagnostic value for GHD is limited by the fact that between 30 and 40% of individuals with severe GHD of adult-onset will demonstrate a serum IGF-I concentration in the low part of the normal age related reference range (17). Nonetheless, in the absence of liver dysfunction or malnutrition, which may secondarily reduce IGF-I generation, and if determined in the appropriate clinical context of pituitary disease and hypopituitarism, a decreased serum IGF-I provides strong confirmatory evidence for GHD.

CLINICAL FEATURES OF GH DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS

Adult GHD is associated with an extensive array of symptoms and physical signs which are now recognised with sufficient precision by experienced endocrinologists to justify their designation as a clinical syndrome (1, 2, 3). The cardinal manifestations are listed in Table 2. Decreased psychological well-being and quality of life are recognised as particularly important and from the patients' perspective have become arguably the major indication for GH replacement therapy. Quality of life issues have been examined using various generic measures including the Nottingham Health Profile and the Psychological General Well Being Schedule. These instruments determine various aspects of health-related and needs-based quality of life and the most prevalent findings from various studies have been deficits in the domains of mood, anxiety and social interaction. Although these findings are readily apparent in many patients with adult-onset GHD, it has proven more difficult to discern similar phenomena in patients with childhood-onset disease. This may be due to at least two factors. Firstly, standard generic quality of life instruments may be insensitive in the investigation of young people and secondly, there may be a major element of psychological adaptation or decreased expectation when the condition has commenced early in life. In an attempt to improve the reproducibility of studies of quality of life in GHD adults, questionnaires have been developed which focus on those symptoms which are most frequently documented in hypopituitary adults during extended open interviews. One such instrument, which is now widely used for the baseline and longitudinal follow-up of patients, is the Quality of Life Assessment in Growth Hormone Deficient Adults (QoL-AGHDA). This is a needs-based instrument consisting of 25 questions with a yes/no answer format and the final score is obtained by summating all the positive responses; a higher score, to a maximum of 25, denotes poorer quality of life. The questionnaire has been shown to be reproducible in a variety of languages and satisfies Rasch analysis criteria for unidimensionality, construct validity and hierarchical ordering of items (22).

GHD is characterised by substantial changes in body composition with increments in total fat, percentage fat and particularly visceral fat mass. Methodologies employed for this purpose have included dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (11), bioelectrical impedance (1, 2, 3) or the simple measurement of the ratio of waist to hip circumference (23) (figure 1) and there is complete concordance between all studies which have examined these aspects in hypopituitary adults. Importantly, although the prevalence of obesity is increased in hypopituitary adults, the increment in visceral fat is also evident in those patients who are non-obese (11). In parallel with changes in fat mass, lean body mass is reduced. The latter may explain the reductions in muscle strength and exercise tolerance which have been documented in adult GHD. The degree to which lean body mass is reduced is difficult to determine because of the reduction in total body water which is also evident in the GHD state; body composition measurements, particularly bioelectrical impedance, may overestimate changes in lean body mass as a consequence of alterations in tissue hydration. Furthermore, the reduction in extracellular water, which is compounded by reduced total body sodium in GHD, may be a major factor underlying the reported reductions in exercise capacity. To this may be added the effect of reduced left ventricular function which has been described in a number of studies.

Figure 1. Data from Drake et al (ref 23)

In contrast to GHD occurring in children, adult GHD is associated with relative insulin insensitivity (8, 11) and an increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus (9). The adverse changes in insulin sensitivity are predictably most obvious in obese patients but are also evident in hypopituitary patients with normal body mass index in whom the inverse relationship between insulin sensitivity and central fat mass which characterises the 'metabolic syndrome' is clearly seen (11). It is therefore likely that the changes in insulin sensitivity observed in adult GHD are due predominantly to increases in central fat mass. It has been postulated that changes in body composition and particularly fat mass might be a consequence of unphysiological glucocorticoid replacement. Against this is the fact that the doses of glucocorticoid replacement used in primary adrenal failure, which are similar to those used in hypopituitarism, are not associated with abnormalities of body composition. However, local tissue exposure to either endogenous or exogenous cortisol may be different in secondary as opposed to primary adrenal failure. The GH/IGF-I axis is now recognised to be an important modulator of the activity of the enzyme 11b hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase Type 1 (11bHSD1) (24). This isoenzyme acts as a predominant reductase, particularly in liver and adipose tissue, increasing the net conversion of inactive cortisone to cortisol. The activity of the enzyme is decreased by GH and, as a consequence GHD is associated with a shift in the equilibrium set point in favour of cortisol. It is therefore possible that the increase in central adiposity which characterises the GHD state could be compounded by enhanced exposure to cortisol within adipocytes; hepatic metabolism might be perturbed by a similar mechanism. These mechanisms would tend to increase serum cortisol concentrations in patients receiving hydrocortisone replacement but not in patients with intact ACTH reserve in whom negative feedback would determine maintenance of stable circulating cortisol concentrations. However, GH is a negative determinant of serum cortisol binding globulin so that comparisons between serum total cortisol concentrations between GHD and GH replete states are not valid.

Adult GHD is associated with increments in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (1, 2, 3). A modest decrement in HDL-cholesterol has also been described in some studies. These changes are evident in both sexes and are quantitatively greater in women. Despite GHD related sodium and water depletion, an increased prevalence of hypertension in adult hypopituitarism has been documented and may be related to reduced activity of nitric oxide synthase, and consequent increased peripheral vascular resistance, as a result of GHD. The changes in lipoprotein metabolism, body composition, insulin sensitivity and peripheral vascular resistance indicated above would predict increased atherogenesis in the GHD state. Indeed, several studies have reported an increase in ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness and plaque formation in large arteries of patients with adult-onset GHD and adults with childhood-onset disease (8, 12).

Decreased bone mineral density is a recognised phenomenon in adult hypopituitary patients and is associated with an increased fracture risk (25, 26). Measurements of markers of bone formation and bone resorption are consistent with a low bone turnover state in GHD. Deficits in bone mineral content and density are more striking in adults with childhood-onset GHD and this is likely to be a consequence of failure to achieve genetic potential peak bone mass either because of inadequate GH replacement in childhood or its early cessation at the time of slowing of linear growth. Failure to achieve peak bone mass has important implications for the future development of osteoporosis and fracture risk. The situation in hypopituitarism is further complicated by the frequent accompaniment of gonadal steroid deficiency, frequently of unknown duration. In addition, glucocorticoid replacement for primary adrenal failure is associated with modest reductions in bone mineral density. Nonetheless, available evidence indicates that qualitatively similar changes in bone mineral density are found in adult-onset isolated GHD as in panhypopituitarism, therefore supporting a role for GHD in pathogenesis. Furthermore, these abnormalities in bone metabolism and bone density are favourably influenced by GH replacement (27, 28, 29, 30).

RESPONSE TO GH REPLACEMENT IN ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY

QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING

Potentially, the greatest immediate indication for growth hormone supplementation is in patients who are assessed as having impaired quality of life (QoL). The early high dose placebo controlled trials suggested that around 50% of these patients demonstrated a significant improvement and a desire to continue with replacement longer term (3). The greatest benefit was shown in patients who had severe GHD and greater distress, in terms of energy and vitality, prior to commencing growth hormone. More recent experience using lower doses with fewer side effects, indicate clear improvement with wish to continue of >90% in patients selected on the basis of a perceived QoL deficit (23, 31). A six month course of optimally-titrated GH replacement is usually needed before the benefits can be assessed clearly, although many patients show a substantial improvement in QoL within three months. For reasons that are unclear, a small proportion of patients (<20%) may not demonstrate significant subjective benefit in QoL until 9 to 12 months after commencing treatment (22). It is important to recognise that the time taken to achieve a maintenance dose of GH may extend to 12 weeks in some patients and is longer on average in women (23); this should be recognised in therapeutic trials of GH replacement with a finite time frame. It is clear that the time taken to derive subjective benefit from GH replacement in many patients provides strong evidence against a pure placebo effect in this respect. Furthermore, the duration of benefit in QoL, which has been observed for periods of up to 10 years, is similarly indicative of a therapeutic rather than a placebo phenomenon (16).

The reasons for the differences in QoL outcome between the early studies and current clinical practice has been the subject of much debate and at least two factors are likely to be particularly relevant. Firstly, the initial randomised control trials utilised GH doses based on body weight or surface area and did not take account of the substantial variation in individual responsiveness to GH occurring as a result of gender and other factors. This strategy resulted in excessive GH doses in men and obese subjects and relative undertreatment of women. The adverse symptoms associated with excess GH doses included arthralgia and myalgia, due to GH-induced antinatriuresis, and it is probable that these factors may have obscured potential subjective benefit. In addition, it is probable that the strict entry criteria inherent in any placebo-controlled study designed to prove concept may have inadvertently eliminated those patients who were most likely to demonstrate benefit in QoL. This latter phenomenon is readily evident when baseline indices of quality of life in patients enrolled into randomised control trials are compared with those of patients commencing GH replacement selectively in the clinical practice setting (23, 31, 32, 33).

The mechanism for the beneficial effect of GH on well-being and QoL remains speculative. GH has been shown to cross the blood brain barrier and to exert physiological effects in the central nervous system as evidenced by the generation of neurotransmitters. However, the effects of GH in restoring normal hydration and increasing exercise capacity are additional potential contributors to the positive effects on well-being.

BODY COMPOSITION: FAT MASS, FAT DISTRIBUTION AND LEAN BODY MASS

Growth hormone replacement produces a significant redistribution of body mass, decreasing body fat, and particularly central fat, and increasing lean body mass (1, 2, 3). Body fluid balance is also restored. The beneficial effects of GH on total body fat and its distribution have been examined by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, computerised tomography, bioelectrical impedance and ratio of waist to hip circumference (figure 1) and qualitatively similar results obtained with excellent concordance between virtually all reported studies. The restoration of normal total body water may result in an artefactual increment in determinations of lean body mass particularly when the latter is measured by bioelectrical impedance. The abnormal fat distribution in GHD is characterised by an increase in the ratio of waist to hip circumference and during long term follow up, serial measurement of waist circumference provides a simple, rapid and reproducible means of monitoring improvement in body fat distribution.

Reductions in body fat are attributed to the lipolytic effect of GH but additional indirect hormonal effects may be important. The conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine was shown to be enhanced by GH in early studies of GH replacement although this is a dose related phenomenon and is less evident with the lower doses in current use. However, the enzyme which interconverts cortisol and cortisone thus controlling glucocorticoid clearance in vivo,11bHSD1, shows increased activity in the GH deficient state and is normalised by low dose GH replacement; the consequent increase in cortisol metabolism may result in reduced tissue specific exposure to glucocorticoid in adipocytes and hepatocytes (24). The latter effect provides an additional explanation for decreased total and central fat mass during GH replacement.

EXERCISE CAPACITY AND PERFORMANCE

Increased exercise capacity, as measured by maximal oxygen uptake, power output and isometric muscle strength, has been observed during GH replacement in GHD adults. The impact of these changes for individual patients is variable and dependent on age and previous exercise requirements. It is intuitively probable that the improvements depend at least in part on improvements in lean body mass. However, restoration of normal circulating volume may also play a positive role. In addition, improvement in psychological well-being might be expected to enhance physical activity whilst the latter may have a reciprocal beneficial effect on well-being.

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM AND INSULIN SENSITIVITY

Untreated GHD of adult onset is associated with reduced insulin sensitivity which is, at least in part, related to increased central adiposity (9, 11). The latter improves within the first 3 months of GH replacement but this does not result in an immediate improvement in insulin sensitivity (11). In fact, because of the antagonistic effects of GH on the actions of insulin mediated by hepatic effects, and the increase in circulating free fatty acids, there is on average a further decline in insulin sensitivity which subsequently returns to baseline over the first year of GH replacement therapy (9). The decline in insulin sensitivity during GH therapy is associated with a slight elevation of fasting plasma glucose and a parallel increase in glycated haemoglobin, both within the normal reference range (figure 2). Importantly, the increment in glycated haemoglobin is not evident in patients with prior abnormality of glucose tolerance but is significantly correlated with baseline body mass index, the latter emphasising the importance of additional dietary and lifestyle advice in these patients. Reference to the KIMS database indicates that there is an increased baseline prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus prior to commencing GH replacement but, subsequently the incidence of new cases of diabetes is not increased provided body mass index is accounted for. As yet, the long term effects of GH replacement on insulin sensitivity are unclear but are likely to vary depending on age and duration of pituitary disease.

Figure 2. Data from Florakis et al (ref 14)

SERUM LIPOPROTEIN PROFILES

The effect of GH replacement on lipoprotein profiles has been examined in various studies using differing dose regimens. Regardless of whether the GH dose has been based on body weight or titrated against serum IGF-I the universal finding has been a reduction of serum total cholesterol. accounted for virtually entirely by a reduction in LDL-cholesterol (14). The extent of this reduction is greatest in those patients with higher baseline serum cholesterol (figure 3) and the median change in an unselected hypopituitary population is between 0.3 and 0.4 mmol/L (14, 15). Importantly, the improvement in LDL-cholesterol is additive to the effects of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors if the patient is receiving concurrent therapy (figure 4). The degree of reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol during GH replacement would predict an overall reduction in cardiovascular events in the region of 20%. In addition, some studies have documented an increase in serum HDL-cholesterol but serum triglyceride levels remain unchanged. Serum lipoprotein(a) has been shown to increase in some studies in patients who demonstrated favourable changes in LDL-cholesterol (11, 34) but the data remain somewhat contradictory by virtue of Lp(a) assay differences; the overall significance in terms of cardiovascular risk is unclear.

Figure 3. Data from Florakis et al (ref 14)

Figure 4. Data from Florakis et al (ref 14)

CARDIAC AND PERIPHERAL VASCULAR EFFECTS

The GH/IGF-I axis is a recognised modulator of cardiac function and a positive inotropic effect of GH/IGF-I occurs early in the natural history of acromegaly. In contrast, GHD is associated with a reduction in left ventricular wall mass and cardiac output which is most evident in childhood-onset disease. The variable discordance between childhood-onset and adult-onset GHD in this regard is likely to be due to additional factors impacting on cardiac morphology in adult-onset, including an increased prevalence of hypertension. GH replacement results in increased left ventricular wall mass, fractional shortening, stroke volume and favourable changes in the echocardiographically determined e/a ratio reflecting improved diastolic function (3). In some studies in adult-onset patients, left ventricular hypertrophy has been documented during GH replacement, confirming further the heterogeneity in response to GH replacement. Importantly, GH replacement does not increase blood pressure; in fact, a modest reduction may be seen in patients with pre-existing hypertension reflecting increased generation of nitric oxide as a result of activation of nitric oxide synthase.

INDICES OF BONE REMODELLING AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY

GHD is associated with reduced activity of bone formation and resorption. GH replacement reverses this situation rapidly resulting in increases in markers of bone formation (e.g. osteocalcin and bone specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (e.g. urine deoxypyridinoline) (30). This increase in bone metabolism eventually results in an increase in bone mineral density (BMD) but this is not evident for approximately 18 months of treatment and is preceded by a reduction attributable to an increase in the bone remodelling space (28). The fact that BMD increases under the influence of GH replacement at physiological doses provides important surrogate evidence for an aetiological role for GHD in mediating the reduced BMD observed in hypopituitarism. The improvement is quantitatively more obvious in men than women despite the achievement of similar serum IGF-I SD scores and therefore constitutes a genuine difference in gender susceptibility (figure 5). Although the improvement in BMD would predict a reduction in fracture rates confirmation of this necessitates long term follow up.

Figure 5. Data from Drake et al (ref 30)

SELECTING PATIENTS FOR GROWTH HORMONE REPLACEMENT

The diagnosis of GHD in adults is usually straightforward and consensus guidelines have been established with generalised acceptance. Nonetheless there is continuing debate regarding the selection of patients for GH replacement. Practice varies between countries and is undoubtedly influenced by availability of funding for treatment (33). In UK clinical practice, patients are selected for treatment on the basis of perceived need according to one or more of a number of specific criteria outlined below.

• defined severe GHD with the insulin tolerance test (ITT), glucagon, arginine, or alternative tests such as arginine plus growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH).
• Peak GH response <9mU/l (<3ng/mL) to ITT. The appropriate threshold for the diagnosis of severe GHD using the other provocative tests needs to be cross-validated against the "gold standard" - the ITT definition.
• Patient already receiving full supplementation of other deficient hormones as required.
• Reduced QoL (including a subjective reduction in exercise tolerance or stamina) is the major indication for offering GH replacement. The selection of whom to treat is based on the patient's own perception of QOL reinforced by the objective assessment utilising a disease-specific questionnaire ("adult growth hormone deficiency assessment" - AGHDA) or alternative validated questionnaire.
• GH replacement should also be considered in patients in whom an adverse cardiovascular risk profile and/or osteopenia have been demonstrated.

ESTABLISHING THE MAINTENANCE GH DOSE

The doses used in published studies vary widely and much of the published data in this area is derived from dosing schedules established on body weight or surface area criteria which were in effect an extrapolation of earlier paediatric practice. Ongoing assessment in the routine clinical setting has indicated that patients can now be managed on much lower doses (23, 31, 35). Using a widely accepted clinical strategy, patients are commenced on 0.3 mg somatotrophin subcutaneously once a day initially. The dose is reviewed every two weeks according to clinical response, serum IGF-I and any side effects and the dose is increased if necessary at 4 weekly intervals until the maintenance level is achieved (23). This results in a median dose requirement of 0.4 mg daily with a greater sensitivity to a given dose in male patients so that median dose requirement is lower in men. Serum IGF-I may be in the lower part of the age related reference range in approximately 40% of patients with adult-onset hypopituitarism before any GH treatment across the total age range and this becomes more likely with advancing age. An empirical strategy is to use the minimum dose of growth hormone which places the serum IGF-1 level between the median value and the upper limit of the age matched normal range for the individual patient. This approach minimises the risk of overtreatment and the potential sequelae which may ensue. Serum IGF binding protein-3 and acid-labile subunit lack sensitivity for the titration of GH replacement and are not recommended for this purpose.

ADVERSE EFFECTS

The main adverse effects directly attributable to GH replacement result from the correction of the sodium and water depletion present in GHD patients. They manifest as arthralgia, myalgia, oedema and carpal tunnel syndrome and are usually rapidly reversible with GH dose reduction. They were predominantly a feature of early experience when GH dose was determined by body weight rather than being based on a titration regimen commencing with a low starting dose as described above. Such adverse effects were predictably more frequent in male patients reflecting their greater sensitivity to GH. Benign intracranial hypertension is a recognised complication of GH replacement in paediatric practice but is much less likely in adult patients especially when low doses are used. However, persistent severe headache should prompt examination and investigation to exclude raised intracranial pressure. The potential mitogenic effects of IGF-I have raised concerns regarding a possible increased risk of either neoplasia or regrowth of residual pituitary and peripituitary tumours. Extensive surveillance studies based on large multinational databases, including several thousand patients on GH replacement followed longitudinally, have not demonstrated an increased incidence of de novo neoplasia and prospective magnetic resonance imaging studies have not indicated an increased risk of pituitary or parasellar tumour regrowth(36a, 36b).

GH REPLACEMENT IN ELDERLY HYPOPITUITARY PATIENTS

Published work indicates that the baseline characteristics and response to GH replacement in hypopituitary patients aged over 65 years are qualitatively similar to those in younger patients (36, 37). Importantly, GH deficiency in the elderly is distinguishable on dynamic tests from the well-recognised physiological reduction in spontaneous GH secretion with advancing age (20). It is therefore appropriate to consider older hypopituitary patients for GH replacement and to apply similar criteria to those outlined above.

TRANSITION BETWEEN PAEDIATRIC AND ADULT CARE FOR CHILDHOOD ONSET GHD

Confirmation of persisting GHD at the time of completion of linear growth is important, particularly for patients with isolated GHD. Subsequently, decisions must be taken regarding recommencement of GH or longitudinal clinical observation off treatment. Arguments supporting continuation of GH therapy include the observation of increased accumulation of fat mass off treatment (38, 39) and emerging observations which demonstrate continued acquisition of bone mass in young adults continuing GH in contrast to static bone mass in those discontinuing treatment at the time of completion of linear growth (40). At present there is no clear consensus as to which patients should continue therapy seamlessly, virtually without interruption, and in which patients it may be reasonable to undertake a period of careful clinical assessment. If therapy is continued the optimum dosing strategy has not been clearly defined although a titration approach as outlined above would seem empirically appropriate(42).

COSTS VERSUS BENEFITS OF GH REPLACEMENT THERAPY

Population studies in Sweden have documented a significantly greater medical and social burden for patients with established hypopituitarism. This continuing cost occurs irrespective of the initial cost of treating the pituitary pathology and derives from issues including unemployment, early retirement, depressive illness and requirement for disability pension. A recent social circumstances analysis of the KIMS database has shown that approximately 11% of males and 31% of females require assistance with activities of daily living (41) (figure 6). Additional treatment cost factors, which are more difficult to quantify but which might be inferred from risk factor profiles in adult GHD populations, include increased prevalence of ischaemic heart disease and increased fracture rates. Whilst the cost of providing GH replacement to the hypopituitary population is relatively easily determined on the basis of the minimum estimate data for prevalence of GHD and the known median GH dose requirement, matching this with data for economic benefit requires a quantification of long term complications arising from surrogate markers for long term morbidity observed in GHD patients.

Figure 6. Data from Hernberg-Stahl et al (ref 41)

TREATMENT COSTS

Estimates of cost should recognise that a proportion of GHD adults may be ineligible for GH replacement by virtue of specific contraindications such as active malignant disease or advanced diabetic retinopathy. In addition, other patients may reject therapy on the basis of dislike of injections or absence of perceived symptoms requiring intervention. In addition the attitude of the physician will also determine the take-up of treatment. If we assume that these factors may reduce the potential constituency for treatment to in the region of 80% of the total and we use a conservative estimate of prevalence of hypopituitarism of 1:10,000 then the number of patients requiring replacement is likely to be of the order of eight per 100,000 population. Using data for median GH dose requirement based on the most conservative titration dosing regimens the estimated annual cost for this population will be approximately $420,000. This estimate takes no account of the cost of treatment of childhood-onset GHD persisting into adult life. The latter could potentially triple the constituency for therapy.

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GH REPLACEMENT

Analysis of the economic benefit of GH replacement in adult GHD should take account of possible favourable effects on utilisation of social services in addition to the theoretical beneficial impact on rates of cardiovascular disease and fracture rates. A recent study based on patients enrolled into the KIMS database has demonstrated significant reductions in the numbers of patients requiring assistance with the activities of daily living (figure 6), a decrease in medical consultations and a decrease in hospital in-patient stays over a period of 24 months of GH replacement (figure 7).

Figure 7. Data from Hernberg-Stahl et al (ref 41)

The mean decrement in serum total and LDL-cholesterol observed during GH replacement could, by analogy with other hypolipidaemic interventions, result in an approximately 20-30% reduction in cardiac ischaemic events. Clearly the long-term cost of cardiac morbidity should also be considered. The observation of substantial increments in bone mineral density during GH replacement extending over several years would also predict a reduction in fracture rates with the attendant cost of acute treatment and subsequent rehabilitation. The potential impact of GH replacement on the increased mortality rates described in hypopituitary patients can only be determined by long-term surveillance of treated patients in comparison with normal population data. The multinational databases designed to monitor safety of long-term GH replacement may provide useful information in this regard. Reassuringly, the mortality rates in the KIMS database are currently similar to the background populations (figure 8).

Figure 8.